Talk:Chembra Peak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
This article is maintained by the Indian geography workgroup.
This article is maintained by the Kerala workgroup.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject India because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WP India}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WP India}} template, removing {{WP India}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

This article is a bad paraphrase of several tourism websites. Perhaps somebody can clean it up to something more useful and unique? James084 14:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] height of chembra

Several other sources in the internet, which includes some .gov.in sites like http://keralatourism.gov.in/index.php?source=desti&destid=6636014&catid=&zone=1 seems to think that the height is infact 2100m . I've personally been to the place and have verified it to be the truth from official records. Sad that I cannot quote any reference materials.

The article cited for chembra peak's height as 2000m is questionable. Its an outdated article with a probable typo and can be found in this link: http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/yw/2003/03/15/stories/2003031500900300.htm [Strangely the Wiki article is not referring to this as well.]

I understand that Wiki's policy says "Truth does not matter ... only verifiability does!" and now that Hindu article has published wrong information, Wiki seems to just continue with this.

Personally, I am not much familiar with Wiki and would like to check with the editor before suggesting / making modifications.

Thanks, Sandeep —Preceding unsigned comment added by Usandeep (talkcontribs) 04:44, 20 September 2007 (UTC)