From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Charles W. Chesnutt is part of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions. |
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
Suggested article edit guidelines:
- To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification.
- After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.
|
Charles Chesnutt was born on June 20, 1858. He died in November 1932. When he was only 13 years old his mom died and had to work to raise money for his family. Both of his parents were mullatoes, which meant that they were of mixed racial ancestry.
[edit] Inaccuracies/No sources
There are no sources in the "Life" section, and there are claims made there that I've never heard before, specifically these: "His parents offered to sell him into slavery, but their potential buyer could not come up with more than $23 to pay for him." "It was suspected, however, that he had an affair with Ralph Waldo Emerson, which caused an almost irreversible rift in his marriage, until Susan decided to take him back." Note that Emerson would've been at least 75 years old at this time, and I've never heard such claims about Emerson's sexuality.
These statements about Chesnutt should be removed unless there's a source for them. BillAlbertini (talk) 03:37, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
- I concur, and have removed it. I suspect it is a cleverer-than-usual prank, particularly since Emerson is the least likely of all contemporary literary figures to have been party to a scandal of any type. Lindmere (talk) 20:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)