Talk:Charles Harrelson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Texas, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Texas. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
The question of fact about Jimmy and Joe Chagra falsely discussing Harrelson's involvement in the assasination of Wood is one of personal knowledge. Chagra is a friend of mine and told me this personally. I don't know if I can put this as a primary source but it doesn't get much more primary than that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Politicalmerc (talk • contribs)
My primary concern about this is that Chagra has nothing to lose, nor does he have anything to gain. As a result, I'm not too convinced that Chagra is telling the truth now, especially since he lied in the first place.
He has never identified the so-called deceased hitman, yet one would think that since nothing can be done at this point, that name would be freely given. I would classify the basis of this whole comment as "Dis-information". It is not my intention to say that you don't know what was said, merely that what was said by Chagra is highly questionable and, while it provides interesting background reading material, it does nothing to prove or disprove Harrelson's involvement. Bad guys typically lie to conceal truth, and I don't believe this is any exception. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.149.105.162 (talk • contribs)
Contents |
[edit] Kennedy
The whole paragraph on the Kennedy assasination needs to be rewritten. It doesn't make sense, and it has nothing to do with Harrelson except the first sentence. For example: "Some think he was one of the three tramps photographed after being arrested on November 22, 1963 in a boxcar in the railyard near Dealey Plaza. Harrelson's arresting officer, Marvin L. Wise, claims..."
Ok, "Some think he was one of the tramps," followed by "Harrelson's arresting officer.." Well, which one is it? Is it only alledged that he was one of the tramps, or was he in fact one of the tramps and had an arresting officer????!!!
Unbelievable. Get it together, rewrite this garbage, and repost it. I will give 3 days before deletion. --LLL —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 170.148.10.43 (talk) 18:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC).
[edit] confusing sentence
from the article:
- "Harrelson reportedly shot and killed Wood in the parking lot outside of Wood's San Antonio, Texas, house for a drug dealer out of El Paso, Jamiel Chagra. "
bold mine...not sure what this is referring to so i hesitate to try to rewrite it. El hombre de haha 02:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Red Squad
Can someone please provide a reference for Harrelson being part of the 'red squad' and elaborate further. Cheers john geraghty 00:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Nobody has explained the 'Red Squad' reference so I deleted it. KeithJonsn (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Harrelson.jpg
Image:Harrelson.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
