Talk:Celframe Office

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article seriously needs references to independent third party reviews. Currently the only reviews appear to be PR articles and stories that don't actually show evidence that the writer has installed the software. Certainly there's no balanced critique.

Add to this the fact that most of the content was added by a new user with no other edits and you have a wiki page which is little more than PR for the company.

Stuartyeates (talk) 20:54, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, i have to disagree with you! I have been using this product for 2 years now. I found there was no reference to this product anywhere in wikipedia.org so i added it that's all, so how are new articles written for the first time? I have provided as many links as possible that i found on the web. There is a mix of reviews and articles.

Is it wrong for a new user to submit a new article? This is obscure. Then even you have only a few edits to your credit. If i am PR guy i would have several edits for a living..So, i think your objection is incorrect! So, i hope you will remove it.

[[User:Sean_daj|Sean_daj] —Preceding comment was added at 04:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)