Talk:Cave painting

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Lascaux

In answer to your question regarding cave painting, Robot was the name of the dog who discovered the cave paintings at Lascaux (fell into hole and was found barking at the paintings). --Daniel C. Boyer

does the dog itself really need an article? Woudln't a mention on the Lascaux page be enough? -- Tarquin 20:41 Feb 19, 2003 (UTC)
Yes, I think a mention on the Lascaux pag would be adequate, as Robot didn't really accomplish anything else. --Daniel C. Boyer

Shouldn't this be deleted if more information hasn't been added? Wikipedia is NOT a dictionary. - Kricxjo

IMHO, no. Cave painting is certainly worthy of an encyclopedia article. Just because this entry is only a few lines long is no reason to delete it; it'll be filled out over time. That's the spirit of Wikipedia. Atorpen 17:34 Feb 22, 2003 (UTC)

Oldest multimedia? According to a recent article in the Wall Street Journal almost all such prehistoric decorations, both cave paintings and ancient rock paintings in the American West, are located where there is some unusual echo or other sound effect. Sorry I don't have the citation, but maybe someone else well know more about it and can add something. Ortolan88

Does anybody know any details about the stone hand axe found in a Spanish cave that's on display in New York right now? It was supposedly found in the largest grouping of hominid fossils (Home heidelbergensis) ever found. -- Zoe

[http://www.drakensberg-tourism.com/bushman-rock-art.html This is an interesting link about Drakensberg, but is an advert for a tour company, so I don't want to put it on the page. A recent BBC article on Drakensber Mark Richards 17:24, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Improvement drive

Graphics is currently nominated to be improved by WP:IDRIVE. Vote for it if you want to contribute.--Fenice 20:12, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Geographic scope

Why isn't there any info on cave paintings in Asia or the Americas? I know for a fact that there is a lot of cave art in Asia. SCHZMO 19:39, 2 June 2006 (UTC) I agree, i was studying this in social studies and wondered about it as well. Adolph172

[edit] POV removed, pending citation

Looking around, I could find little substantiation of the idea that the paintings were widely believed to be a creationist hoax. It's more than possible that the referenced Emile Cartailhac did indeed believe the Altamira paintings to be a "creationist hoax", but I can only find that he later issued a Mea Culpa for having believed the paintings were a hoax...no mention of creationism. Furthermore, I would question the importance of the views of a single prehistorian - and would further assert that this basically-insignificant information may simply be intended to make "evolutionists" look silly. I have seen multiple instances of similar POV on wikipedia. The assertion in question is simply too insignificant, too poorly sourced, and too POV to remain without proper citation of a primary source. 68.162.17.105 19:34, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] copyvio problems with Laas Gaa'l article -- can anyone help?

Hi all -- The article on the Laas Gaa'l paintings (which was recently featured on the front page as a "Did you know?" item) contains some text plagiarized from a BBC article, and the image also appears to be a copyvio from the BBC. The person who originally created the article using the plagiarized text has become very combative, and keeps deleting the copyvio tags. If anyone has the expertise to help in rewriting that article without the plagiarisms, that would be very helpful. I would also appreciate it if some other people could take a look at the discussion on the article's talk page, because the situation seems to be degenerating into an edit war, which I don't want to get involved in.--24.52.254.62 04:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

I found nothing here about Bhimbetka - the largest and oldest cave painting site in India. Though the quality of the drawings can not be compared with Alta Mira, they are said to be 10,000 years old. Could someone please give more information? D.Mitra

[edit] Guthrie and Stone

I'm wondering about some of the material related to Guthrie and Stone. It talks about human figurines, goddesses, etc., but there are only a couple human figures among the cave paintings in Europe, and they are more like stick figures than goddesses. It almost seems like this material shouldn't be here. I feel like this article gets off track. TimidGuy 21:17, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Russian cave

Someone added this in the Europe section but I moved it here:

  • Kopova, near Ufa, Russia

It doesn't belong in the Europe section. If we can find out more info about it, then we could create a separate section on it, TimidGuy 11:18, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] End dates

I am puzzled by "The practice died out 10.000 years ago". On Sicilia the quite extensive eneolithic paintings (.. complicati e astrusi arzigogoli lineari e geometrici) in the 'Grotta dei Cavalli' probably date from 3rd mill BC (Tusa). --Nedermaen 21:50, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. I was going by what the source says that I was using -- the book The Cave Painters by Curtis. I added a qualifier to allow for exceptions. Does that help? TimidGuy 14:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes, thanks.

Although I think more accurately would be: "Other examples may date as late as the Early Bronze Age, but the well known prolific and sophisticated style from Lascaux and Altamira died out about 10,000 years ago".

I'm no expert but I'd like to make additional suggestions based on: "Sicily Before History" Robert Leighton "Sicilia Preistorica" Sebastino Tusa "Atlas of Ancient Archaeology" Jacquetta Hawkes My own 'field work', ha, ha. Repeat these are suggestions only.

1) I would suggest that "Cave Art" is a better title for the entry;

  with a pointer from "Cave Paintings" and a 'see also' from "Rock Art"
  and "Petroglyphs". Point 2) will clarify.

2) There seem to be distinct styles in these works:

  a) The well known sophisticated painted figuratives (mainly animals
     it seems) from Lascaux, Altamira, etc. All associated with our
     Cro-Magnon grandparents?
  b) Sculpted three dimensional animals as in Cap Blanc (les Eyzies).
  c) Primitive painted stick figures and symbols on Sicily; similar to 
     CavePainting1.jpg in the entry (Whence that example?).
  d) Sophisticated engraved figures (animals and humans) on Sicily.
  e) Silhouettes or outlines of hand, feet, leaves etc. (handprints).
 (f) Simple unexplained scratches and hatches.) 

3) Sicily should be added, I know half a dozen good examples (Leighton

     lists several more):
     Grotta Audura - extensively documented, but, I believe, undated.  
     Grotta dei Genovesi - extensively documented. Style d) is reportedly
        12.000 years old. Also style c), but I cannot find dates.
     Grotte Niscemi - Style d) (I can provide a reasonably clear photo).
     Grotta dei Cavalli - Style c) (Neolitico Medio e Finale (Tusa))
        (Similar to Porto Badisco (Apulia) and therefore Middle
         Neolithic-Early Copper (Leighton)).
     Grotta Racchio - Style d) a deer and goats; but I could only find
        less exciting scratches f).
     Grotta dei Signora - confusing, may be 'modern', I cannot find
        references.

This is probably more than you asked for. I'd be happy to follow your lead on how to proceed,--Nedermaen 19:54, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

It's really great that you're taking an interest in this article. It was a hodgepodge when I first began looking at it, and had a fair amount of vandalism that had been there a while. You seem knowledgeable. I don't have much time at the moment, but my quick impression is that we add a short section about Sicily and direct readers to a separate article on Sicily's paintings. I would love to organize the article around the distinct styles you outline. And I would love to separate out the rock painting, given that there's already an article on that. I'm glad you pointed that out. I can see your point about "cave art." I guess my only reservation would be that the term "cave paintings" is so widely familiar. I would be inclined to reorganize the article along the different styles, and to have the first part be about painting. Then a major section on cave art. Just some quick thoughts. Will be back later or tomorrow. Thanks so much for your interest in this article. TimidGuy 11:43, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
I added your suggested sentence to the article. TimidGuy 15:37, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Recent material

I'm putting here material that was recently added. There are serious problems with the writing. A very small portion of the material is marginally accurate but much of it is in inappropriate style for an encyclopedia and appears to be vandalism. Further, much of it is speculative. It's possible that a few points could be included but it would need to be extensively rewritten. TimidGuy 12:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Of course, I appreciate the humor. : ) TimidGuy 15:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blombos Caves

I'm moving here a comment that was top-posted by an anonymous user and that messed up the formatting of the Talk page:

In the BLOMBOS CAVES in South Africa there have been found cave art including decorative beads and bones with indents SUGGESTING COUNTING and geometric shapes on them that date back to 140000 yrs they have also found evidence of fishing,further more the ISHANGO BONES found in africa date back to 37000 yrs old making it the worlds oldest discovered mathmatical artifact the bones demonstrate multiplication division prime numbers.if u dont believe me type in BLOMBOS CAVES OR ISHANGO BONES in ur wikipedia browser ME OG was was waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayy behind the powercurve.

Sounds like an interesting discovery. What's with ME OG, though? Why did someone put all that stuff in the article and now this anonymous editor is again referencing it? Something in popular culture? TimidGuy (talk) 12:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Problem in first para of article

The text says: "The earliest known rock paintings are dated to the Upper Paleolithic, 40,000 years ago, while the earliest European cave paintings date to 32,000 years ago." The rest of the article doesn't mention any rock paintings older than the oldest European ones, and actually mentions Chauvet as the oldest known painting. This fits with what I know, but I don't know enough to go and edit the text myself. Are there actually older known cave paintings outside Europe? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sciamanna (talkcontribs) 20:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I'd like to cut all mentions of rock painting from this article, since there's a separate article on that. I do believe that African rock art dates earlier than the European cave paintings. TimidGuy (talk) 20:37, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Oh shoot. I confess that I hadn't even noticed that "cave painting" and "rock painting" referred to two separate things -- I'd assumed they were two ways of referring to the same thing. Tells you how little I know, but also maybe this should be made clearer in the article(s). (Oh and sorry for not signing my previous comment. I'm learning.) Sciamanna (talk) 09:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I've added a note on the Talk page of the article on Rock art suggesting that we move all the info on rock art that's in this article to the rock art article. Maybe this will help avoid the confusion. TimidGuy (talk) 12:21, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Deleted Merlin Stone and Graham Hancock

I deleted the information sourced to Merlin Stone and Graham Hancock. Both of these individuals have produced theories that are very controversial. Per WP:FRINGE I think they are best not included here and that would should stick with the more mainstream sources.

In a thread above I also questioned Guthrie. My mistake. I'm reading his book, and it's excellent. Very scholarly, based on published research. I may use it as a source for some of the information in this article that isn't yet sourced. TimidGuy (talk) 15:07, 3 June 2008 (UTC)