User talk:Catuskoti

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Regarding reversions[1] made on June 12, 2008 to Kathleen Sebelius

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

To clarify, any edit which serves to undo another user's edit is considered a "revert" - and the three reverts do not need to be of the same edit in order to earn you a block on this. Furthermore, the rule isn't really intended to give you three free reverts every 24 hours. If you're going to undo the work of other editors, the least you can do is explain your reasoning on the article's Talk page. (ESkog)^(Talk) 22:03, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] You appear to be involved in an edit war. Note the 3-revert-rule, please.

Dear Catuskoti: Below is the comments you left on my talk page, even though you have already violated the 3RR rule: You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Catuskoti (talk) 02:29, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Catuskoti

Dear Admin: Please note that the above editor, Catuskoti, has only edited ONE article in his/her edit history in Wikipedia. Also, please note that Catuskoti has already violated the 3RR rule in his/her edit history of the article about Kathleen Sebelius. And finally, dear Admin, please note that Catuskoti is violating every single thing that he/she is warning about--clearly Catuskoti is NOT editing in good faith.--InaMaka (talk) 02:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Please edit in good faith. The above warning by you and your desire to impose your POV on the Sebelius article indicate that you are not editing in good faith.--InaMaka (talk) 02:42, 13 June 2008 (UTC)