Talk:Catholic League (French)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Isn't this Catholic League also, and perhaps better, known as the "Holy League"? I'd think it should at least mention that as a bold-alt-title. Alai 16:25, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
I plan to expand on this stub as part of a research assignment for George Mason University. Spring 2008.wsbonduran (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 14:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
I updated my first draft at updating this entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wsbonduran (talk • contribs) 02:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- The article does need an overhaul. Perhaps some basic bibliography would make a start in the right direction.--Wetman (talk) 20:05, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- A recent edit under a summary "tried to edit out bias, provided balanced information" but which substitutes an uncritical RC whitewash, is scarcely a step in the right direction. This article now needs to be rewritten from ground up, sticking close to published assessments, both apologetical and historical. --Wetman (talk) 02:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Everything added came from verified references, what you call "published" assessments. As such the article is greatly improved on the previous version which painted the Catholic League as genocidal monsters bent on the murder of all none Catholics and referred to them as "like todays terrorist Jihad", while not quoting any references directly to back up these obviously biased comments. (Volpius Leonius (talk) 23:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC)}
- Substitution of one bias for another is not "balance", still less compliance with NPOV. Unfortunately, the bias tag must stick until an objective version comes along.FactStraight (talk) 23:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] References
I have returned the deleted References section, on the principle that this article will be rendered more wholesome and authentic when it sticks closely to assessments of reputable historians, and that deletions of references, under whatever justification, are not symptoms of a collegial view. I have edited together the suppressed historical view without deleting any of the RC apologia, for which unidentified references are asserted.--Wetman (talk) 03:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
