User talk:Carte Rouge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Carte Rouge! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

[edit] Momofuku (restaurants)

If you can find verifiable, reliable sources which substantiate the notability of this company, please do so on this page: User:Carte Rouge/Momofuku (restaurants) <-- a subpage in your own user space.

Once you are finished, let me know and I'll help you with any issues which would cause it to become speedily deleted again; then we'll reintroduce it into the main article space. Sound good? - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 16:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Done! Feel free to hit me up on my talk page with any questions. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 16:38, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Generally, unless the blog is run by a notable person who does not have a conflict of interest is posting about the topic. The content must usually be notable for it to have its own article, like Rosie O'Donnell vlog of constant ranting ;-). - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 16:49, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

What makes these restaurants notable except for their notable owner? This information looks like it would probably best be merged into David's article. Photos, unless legally uploaded, should not be externally linked. The blog links should not go directly to the comments sections. The restaurant reviews can be cited within the article; this is better practice for giving specific references to points in an article.

Will you be editing other food-related articles, or is this your only interest? - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 17:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I was going to write articles on the notable restaurants I've visited - this was the one I was at most recently, but, unless already done, I'd like to write on per se (restaurant). WD-50, Masa (restaurant) and Alinea (restaurant) for starters, as those are the obviously-notable ones. I guess merging all the information to David Chang's article makes sense. I'll go ahead and do that. I can't look at the flikr pages from work - my assumption is that they are camera phone photos, thus legal if released acceptably. Carte Rouge (talk) 17:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Also, it's a bit ironic. David Chang is famous cause of the restaurants, but now he's more famous than they are, even though he's done nothing else! Carte Rouge (talk) 17:15, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] California cuisine

Not only does your edit resolve the dispute with the article, it is very well written and makes the article much more credible than it was before. Thank you. 64.238.172.212 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 22:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)