Talk:Carson Cistulli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Prod Tag

Please do not remove the prod tag on this article. It has had a notability tag on it since December, and no one has added anything to it to make a case for notability. Therefore, the prod tag is warranted. Ckessler 21:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edits

I am making a case for the subject's notability.Seancasey 23:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do, I would be happy to see the article stay. Just leave the prod tag where it is. Ckessler 21:27, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

The prod tag notes that it may be removed once edits are made. I have added links to a publishing house and radio station, both notable.Seancasey 23:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

As I added the prod I shall add my observations here. There was no claim of notability, and in my opinion, there still isn't, only confirmation that Cistulli broadcasts on a couple of radio stations and has a book of poetry out. Could even be vanity publishing for all I know. If you can find and/or cite a major 3rd party reference to Cistulli then notability WP:V is established. Please edit away, but you still have to establish that this article is more than a spamlink. as for the PROD, once it is removed it becomes a contested deletion and, if anybody wants to, they can list it for deleletion WP:AFD. BTW You should sign on talk pages- use 4 tildes (~) Hope this all helps. --Richhoncho 22:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Casagrande is not a vanity house; its site provides evidence to contrary. The article is not a spamlink, nor are any of its links. If, in the history of spam, poetry were ever involved, spam would kick poetry out for its inability to sell. I will update page with links to reviews of the book. Seancasey 23:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Carson 72dpi.jpg

Image:Carson 72dpi.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)