Talk:Carol Molnau

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, which aims to improve all articles related to Minnesota.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article is on a subject of Low-importance within Minnesota articles.
This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Neutraility?

On 28 September ISP 74.38.90.197 added a neutrality tag to this article, but aside from some rather tame snarkiness I don't see much controversy here. Anyone care to defend the tag? I'll take it down in about a week if I don't see any reasons as to why it should be there. Lizz612 20:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

I was going to add all the positive things one could say about Ms. Molnau to add balance. I'm still trying to think of something to add. --Appraiser 21:13, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure we need balance (I said something bad now I should say something good "She has nice hair") as much as we need to present the facts in a manner that is not biased. That said, I don't think much of the facts here are biased. "Debacle" might be a bit of a loaded term, but other than that, I don't see it. Lizz612 20:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

•I'm thinking "mishap" might be a better word than "debacle" so I'm changing that, giving it another read through, and tomorrow I'll probably take down the Neutrality tag. Unless anyone else has anything to add to this discussion (if you can call it that).Lizz612 18:54, 2 November 2007 (UTC)