Talk:Carnac stones
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Carnac stones is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks. | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. See comments | |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Archaeology, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
 |
An entry from Carnac stones appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 13 May 2006. |
 |
Contents |
[edit] Sources
"I would like to hear from people whether they consider this level of footnoting excessive" [1] No. Global spread of H5N1 has 125 sources cited. Sources good. Nonsourced content bad. But if you are worried about appearances you can put multiple sources in one single footnote at the end of a paragraph or section. (WAS 4.250) 4.250.177.133 14:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Aerial Photos
Some of the sections are hard to understand without aerial photos. Can some be had via a free source, say, a government? Anybody have a small plane? —ScouterSig 18:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:40, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Map needed
This article needs an overview map/diagram showing the big picture arrangement. -69.87.200.153 02:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject France Assessment
This article was listed on WikiProject France under articles needing assessment. This article has been rated B-class because:
- It contains a sufficient amount of information for the reader to feel satisfied, further it is well sourced/cited.
- The article contains interesting images that help with the understanding of the topic--however, as noted above it could benefit from a map/aerial photo.
- I feel like the editing/style could be worked on a little--some of the subheading are only one/two sentences long and give the article a "cluttered" effect.
- There is still some unreferenced info, for example in the "Dolmen" section: "these dolmens are generally considered to have been tombs, constructed with several large stones supporting a "capstone", then buried under a mound of earth."
In general though, the article seems informative and was interesting to me. Good work. Lazulilasher (talk) 18:22, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
