Talk:Carisbrook

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Cricket Portal Click here for information about how the WikiProject assesses notability Carisbrook is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked Categories and templates: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no <!-- 6. It is fully and correctly categorised and carries all appropriate templates. --> |B-Class-6=yes/no

	Carisbrook is part of WikiProject New Zealand, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Someone needs to update the article in that it the new stadium has gained required funding and will go ahead

Contents 1 In case you're thinking this is a copy vio... 2 Terraces 3 Article name 4 Sadly? 5 Carisbook is still active

[edit] In case you're thinking this is a copy vio...

...yes, some of this does look suspiciously like part of the CricInfo article on Carisbrook. I wrote that article. Grutness|^hello? 05:51, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Just shows we need to make sure its neutral. - Purdonkurt

[edit] Terraces

There really ought to be a mention of the Terraces, as I believe that's become a unique feature of Carisbrook, when other stadiums have gone to all assigned seating. 66.68.106.103 03:26, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

good point - done! Grutness...wha? 10:53, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Article name

Why is this at Carisbrook (stadium) and not just Carisbrook? Evil Monkey∴Hello 01:51, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sadly?

In the last paragraph, it mentions 'sadly' at the start. This is not neutral and brakes Wikipedia's 'policies'.

Therefore it will be changed.

[edit] Carisbook is still active

Why did someone change the article to say Carisbrook "was" from is (eg Carisbrook was Dunedin's major sporting venue) - it still exists and will host a test match in 2008. It need's quite a bit of a tidy up - has anyone got time for a re-write and to make it flow better!