Carroll v. United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Carroll v. United States | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||
| Submitted March 14, 1924 Decided March 2, 1925 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| Holding | ||||||||||
| Police searches of automobiles without a warrant do not violate the Fourth Amendment when the police have probable cause to believe contraband would be found in the automobile. | ||||||||||
| Court membership | ||||||||||
| Chief Justice: William Howard Taft Associate Justices: Joseph McKenna, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Willis Van Devanter, James Clark McReynolds, Louis Brandeis, George Sutherland, Pierce Butler, Edward Terry Sanford |
||||||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||||||
| Majority by: Taft |
||||||||||
| Laws applied | ||||||||||
| Fourth Amendment, Volstead Act | ||||||||||
Carroll v. U.S., 267 U.S. 132 (1925), became the case that police searches of automobiles without a warrant do not violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution when the police have probable cause to believe contraband would be found in the automobile. The rationale of the decision was that automobiles are mobile and thus law enforcement would be unreasonably hindered if forced to seek a search warrant for a place that would perhaps be elsewhere and hidden by the time the warrant was signed.
This decision, rendered in the early days of personal automobiling, marked the start of the legal gulf between reasonable expectations of privacy in one's home and automobile.
The opinion was delivered on March 2, 1925, by Chief Justice William Howard Taft.
[edit] See also
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 267
- California v. Acevedo,

