Talk:Capability Maturity Model Integration

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] more details about the model?

the spanish version has more details about the model, like the 5 leves, the 2 models, etc can someone help me translate it? thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.114.255.237 (talk) 03:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Company references

Rather than list commercial companies providing CMMI consultancy, the SEI Partner List has been included and commercial cross-references deleted. -- Ashley VH 08:54, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

I have removed the SCAMPI list of companies as linking to their commercial sites seemed to add very little value to someone finding out about CMMI. If you want to add another external link to a commercial site (especially your own organization) please think about WP:ADS and WP:EL first and preferably add some justification to this talk page. --Ashley VH (talk) 10:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] How do we get a citation for "overly bureaucratic" ?

I tried to find a reference for the "overly bureaucratic" statement in the history section, and Google had 74 links.

However, all of them seem in some way to be derived from Wiki.

What's to be done now? cojoco 23:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

AFAIK, CMMi is about controlling the deviation from self-defined process aka rules. So, it is obviously bureaucratic. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rrjanbiah (talk • contribs) 06:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Come again?

The thing I like about Wikipedia is it's ability to answer questions like "but what IS it, really?" in about 1/10th of the time I could from reading the marketing speel. Unfortunately this article provoked no such eureka moment :-( 172.203.199.18 19:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

I agree. This article does not provide a good overview for a reader who is not familiar with the subject. - Davidfstr (talk) 15:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

I believe it serves it purpose of what it is intended for. It cannot be detail, if it does, it may be overwelming for the reader. The user of that particular topic must first be familiar with the reference topic. Therefore, Wikipedia is a good reference source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.102.20.30 (talk) 03:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Commercial "free offer"

I have moved this link from the references to this talk page. It's a nice free offer (in order to attract potential customers) but it's not a real reference.

--Ashley VH (talk) 10:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)