User talk:Cane sg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] February 2008

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Ho Yeow Sun has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Pandacomics (talk) 19:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] COI Warning

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, i.e Ho Yeow Sun, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  • Editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
  • Participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
  • Linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam)
  • You must always avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, attribution, and autobiography.

Such cases may be refered to the COI Notice Board when they cause disruption to the encyclopedia as reported by any uninvolved members of WP:FACT or RC Patrollers, which may lead to accounts being blocked next and embarrassment for the individuals and groups who were being promoted. Kindly note. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 01:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, really. Jpatokal (talk) 05:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Final Warning

I'm a member of WP:FACT, and I've read Ho Yeow Sun & its talkpage previously & as such, verified (I've access to newspaper archives) & edited the statement accordingly so as to give balance coverage on the issue concerned earlier. In view of the on-going edit-warring, I've recommended the affected parties concerned (in my edit summary) to refer the case to WP:BLP Noticeboard again so as to settle this issue once & for all, for the common good of Wikipedia. If u continue with your disruptive acts again, I'll follow-up next in reporting u formally for engaging in troll-like behaviour, bad faith reverts, possible sockpuppetry and COI in Wikipedia, according to your disruption & edit history to date as mentioned above. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 05:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for deletion of sections after warning. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —Dark talk 07:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)