Talk:Cambridge capital controversy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Some of the language in this article is unnecessarily one-sided in favor of Neo-Kaynesianism, such as this passage: "Most practically-minded neoclassical economists reacted to this problem by simply clinging to the simple model that they had inherited from Solow and Swan."

[edit] By gum, this is a good article.

This is place is essentially horrid (most maths and science pages excepted), but this is just a fantastic piece.

It has style. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.89.169.22 (talk) 13:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] To the unknown author:

Thank you for the article. One of the better ones I have ever read here in Wikipedia. --Uncertain (talk) 15:31, 16 April 2008 (UTC)