Cammarano v. United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Cammarano v. United States | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||
| Argued November 19, 1958 Decided February 24, 1959 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| Holding | ||||||||||
| Court membership | ||||||||||
| Chief Justice: Earl Warren Associate Justices: Hugo Black, Felix Frankfurter, William O. Douglas, Tom C. Clark, John Marshall Harlan II, William J. Brennan, Jr., Charles Evans Whittaker, Potter Stewart |
||||||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||||||
| Majority by: Harlan |
Cammarano v. United States, 358 U.S. 498 (1959),[1] was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that business may not deduct expenses they incurred for the "promotion or defeat of legislation" as "ordinary and necessary" business expenses on their federal income tax filing.
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Facts of the case
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Prior history
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Decision of the Court
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Concurring opinions
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Dissenting opinions
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Effects of the decision
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Critical response
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Subsequent history
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] References
- ^ {{{2}}} U.S. {{{3}}} Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.

