Talk:CakePHP

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Release links

I removed the link to release 1.0 (obsolete). Also, if there's a release history, it should only contain relevant versions (major builds at least). AxiomShell 10:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

After I wrote the article I saw the deletion log. I realize writing a new article may not have been wise, however CakePHP appears to be a wanted article. I do not know what the article contained before, but CakePHP is not a manual for PHP any more than say, Mambo or MediaWiki for that matter. --Phil Harnish (Info | Talk) 05:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

I agree. As someone learning about web technlogies, I found this artice helpful. It could certainly be improved upon (and maybe after i learn more I'll come back and do that) but an article here on CakePHP can serve to put the technolgy into context in a way that other sources of information do not. Nicholsr 09:41, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't see what the problem is with the feature list. These are features one would be wondering about.--Cynthiaishere 03:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NPoV; citations needed

"Application Scaffolding"? Googling it gives few results (~500), most of which are biased. Is that a term invented by CakePHP developers? How NPoV is this point? Perhaps create Application scaffolding first before using it? It's not even clear to me what it's supposed to mean. --dionyziz 18:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC).

Removing from points. Please feel free to readd, but include some kind of explanation! --dionyziz 08:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC).

Readding with citation --dionyziz 08:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC).

Scaffolding is a term used in Ruby on Rails for a sort of boilerplate program design (think of the scaffolding one puts up when working on a building then takes down later). If it is appropriate to say that cakePHP is "based on rails", then it should be equally appropriate to use Rails terminology to describe features it allegedly borrowed TheBilly (talk) 12:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)