Talk:Cê

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on May 23, 2008.
May 29, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cê/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

  • The non-inline cited reference at the bottom could go in its own section... perhaps have a ==References==, and then a ===Works cited=== and ===Footnotes=== or something like that...
    • Split into ==Footnotes== and ==References==.
  • I suck at writing leads. Have you tried to improve it since I worked on it?
    • Seems pretty good to me...aren't you supposed to give me constructive criticism? :) Seriously, though, all I've changed is the sentence about critical commentary.
  • "When he writes lyrics, Veloso typically uses the word você, but sings cê" - might want to make it more clear that he writes você by says cê (am I right?)... it's a bit awkward for now
    • Smoothed out a bit, I think.
  • "However, the inspiration for the album's title came when the musician physically wrote cê instead" - The however seems out of place, and this is a bit awkward in general...
    • See above.
  • "from nearly every critic reviewing it" - you only cite... two reviews, so it's a bit weird to say this...
  • Could you use some more reviews from here? Even small snippets from stuff not linked would be cool, I guess... to give some more variety

Please leave a note on my talk page when you're done with these comments. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 12:02, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

All looks good, so passed. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 01:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)