Talk:Byzantine text-type

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Examples are needed of textual variations between the Alexandrian and Byzantine text-types.

Couldn't someone add a picture?>Ψ

[edit] Textus Receptus

I have reverted an edit which added a value judgment as to the quality of the Textus Receptus. Two reasons for this; a. they do not conform to Wikipedia conventions on Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View; b. they are to do with the Textus Receptus, rather than with the Byzantine Text/Majority Text. 10:29, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

• apologies - I should have noted the earlier POV edits, and have now removed them; as they reduced the article to gobbledigook, through eliminating entirely one side of the debate. TomHennell (talk) 17:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Picture from Codex Alexandrinus (folio 76r)

This beautiful picture presents the end of the Book of Acts and the beginning of Letter of James. These two books represents alexandrian text-type, but article treats about byzantine text-type, it means this picture is located in wrong place. It will better to move it to article Alexandrian text-type, where is his place. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 15:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Grammatical problems, first paragraph

The last sentence of the first paragraph, makes little sense and is not grammatical. I did not correct it because I, an outsider, have no idea what was intended. Stifynsemons (talk) 03:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)