Talk:Bruno Behrend

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

As a listener, I added a comment on the actual content of the "Extreme Wisdom show with Bruno Behrend."

I believe that this is a relevant and useful addition to the otherwise barren (and useless) citation.

Without a discussion of the content, one might describe "War and Peace" as "A large book with many pages"

If the commentary on "War and Peace" were extremely biased, it would still have no place on wikipedia. If the commentary contained an actual summary of the issues discused it would be of some value, but lofty claims about it being the new standard for all talk shows do not add any insight and are mere opinion ______

Hi,

I'm Bruno Behrend, and I would like to add some context to the this page, given that it's about me.

I don't know the reason nor the person who started this page and/or edited it, but the information on the front page is mostly accurate, and unbiased in either direction. I would be happy to expand or expound on the page, but that, in and of itself may be considered biased.

I noticed that the page has been marked for deletion. I would like to know what I can do to improve the page so that it stays on Wikipedia. I've read some of the guidelines, and there is information I can provide to improve and expand the page. The reason I've commented here first, is that I'm assuming a person editing their own entry might be considered self-serving.

If some one from Wikipedia can provide some guidance, I will happy to do what I can to improve this page

brunobehrend@comcast.net

71.201.41.149 (talk) 15:31, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Bruno Behrend