Talk:Bruges Group
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The first paragraph is quite clearly biased. It seems as though two people have had an editting debate. There are two issues there:
1) Whether or not the Burges Group is officially linked to the Conservative Party. The answer is no.
2) Whether or not the Burges Group shares members with the Conservative Party. The answer is yes.
These are not the same thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.206.86.146 (talk • contribs)
I have removed some unreferenced generalisations which are open to dispute and have been in the article for a considerable time. Happy to see something similar go back in if it is better referenced. Proteus4 20:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Inaccurate description
Where is the evidence that Robert Oulds has reinvigorated the bruges group?
This is not true.
The Bruges Group was much more active and influential throughlout the 1990s than it has been since.
[edit] Article has deteriorated
IMHO this article has sharply deteriorated over about the last month and a whole load of interesting historical information has gone and links removed. Can we collectively build up the article again. Proteus4 11:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- I agree, and have added back the material which was removed in the edits of April 2007. It seems encyclopaedic and no argument was made to remove it. I hope that in future anyone who wishes to remove major sections of the article will discuss their reasons for doing so on the talk page. Terraxos 05:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

