Talk:Brookgreen Gardens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Zoo, a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to zoos, aquaria, and aviaries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Carolina, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve South Carolina-related articles to a feature-quality standard.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.

[edit] Lots of pictures

There are a lot of pictures on this page, more than are necessary and this might hurt some dial-up user who try to access the page. When I found them, they were in a big mess and formatted oddly, so I stuck them in a gallery, but I don't think that they are all necessary to the page. Could we think of removing some of them? --Sbrools (talk . contribs) 15:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

It is rather picture-heavy, considering how relatively little text it has. Think there's a simple option to fix. I'll work on it. --Ebyabe 17:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Done! It was under the WP:NRHP umbrella, which is how a Florida boy caught this. :) What I discovered was that most of the pix were stored at WikiCommons. So I created a page there for the gardens, made galleries and added all the ones I could find so they could be seen there. Put the more material at WikiCommons tag on the main page of this article, and removed most of the pix. Made one gallery at the bottom with a smaller representative sampling of pictures. Left the links to the sections, 'cause all that good work shouldn't go to waste. A few more could get added, but I'd say there shouldn't be more than a dozen, in any case. At least until the article itself is bigger, that is. It definitely makes it easier to read the actual article. Hope that helps! -Ebyabe 18:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)