Talk:Britta Böhler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]


[edit] NPOV tag

This article uses phrases like "notorious" and "left-wing, activist." While I disagree with Britta Böhler's views, I think that an accurate description of them would not contain loaded words like these.


Whilst I see that notorious could possibly be misinterpreted, I disagree with the qualification of 'left-wing' and 'activist' to be NPOV. She herself used these words on many occasions, furthermore I do not neccessarily see how these words carry a negative (or positive for that matter) connotation. They simply describe her views.

As to notorious; I specifically chose notorious since she is widely known and she generally elicits a rather negative response (justified or not). Personally I have a neutral stance on her views, in essence she does nothing else than a lawyer who defends people that are obviously guilty but still deserve legal council under the rule of law. She, however defends people that are 'famous'. This automatically elicits a negative reponse among the populace. That is a fact, not a pleasant one but a fact nonetheless. Feel free to clarify if neccessary. Chelman 18:07, 27 October 2005 (UTC)


As to left wing and activist. See the bio on the following page:

http://www.novatv.nl/index.cfm?LN=nl&FUSEACTION=biografieen.details&BIOGRAFIE_ID=294

This is from a Dutch Actuality TV show. The terms are used there as well. Furthermore they quote Bohler as saying that she supported the ideals of the Rote Armee Faktion. I believe that the RAF can certainly be considered a left-wing organisation. Chelman 18:14, 27 October 2005 (UTC)


I changed notorious to controversial and expanded the bio. I removed the NPOV tag since no potentially offending statements remain. Chelman 12:04, 31 October 2005 (UTC)