Talk:Brickfish
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Notability
For reliable third-party coverage, see here. — xDanielx T/C 01:35, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reverting...
I hate to reverse substantial contributions like this one, but in addition to being highly promotional (that's not something I say often), the whole thing is just far too overgeneralized and lacking clear information. As an encyclopedia, our aspiration must be to present specific facts in an objective and concise manner. If this was a product of some public relations task, please read Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines, particularly WP:COI, WP:NPOV, and WP:WEASEL. — xDanielx T/C 00:54, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] {{advertisement}}, {{refimprove}}
I don't think these tags are needed.
- Though this was essentially an advertisement at one point, the current version was written mainly by me (an unaffiliated editor). It describes the basic functionality of the network with what I believe is a neutral tone. It may seem more positive than negative, but this is normal for startups like these which don't really have critics.
- I don't think any claims in the article are lacking sources; all the information currently in the article can be gathered from the 4 existing references. If the concern is about reliable sourcing as it relates to our notability guideline, see my note above for links which do establish notability (but aren't needed in the article itself right now).
