Talk:Brickfilms LLC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:BrickfilmsLLC

Template:BrickfilmsLLC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. 68.39.174.238 05:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

I tried following the "candidate for deletion" link and can't find any mention of Brickfilms there. Think the page shouldn't be deleted. Think the page probably needs to state upfront something along the lines that the site is about making animated films using Lego. Surprising as this may be to some people, it wasn't immediately obvious when reading the page that it's really was about Lego flicks. Cheers Jon. Aug 16 2006

I see what you mean. I added a little tidbit about brickfilming. Didn't want to make it too long, but didn't want it to be confusing or anything. --Oisterjosh 17:32, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BFNewLogo.gif

Image:BFNewLogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:50, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability

Have cleaned the article up and flagged it for notability. One claimed I removed was that the site "has been mentioned in dozens of newspapers, magazines, television shows, and other websites" - while this is a good indication towards notability, it isn't a meaningful claim by itself. Would someone mind providing actual sources? --McGeddon (talk) 17:50, 11 May 2008 (UTC)