Talk:Brian J. Mistler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
Socrates This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.

Much of Brian Mistler's writing discuss the limited utility of theory in applied therapy, and speak against rational justification. Why do you have him listed as a philosopher?

[edit] Notability

Wikipedia has guidelines dictating that the subjects of articles must be notable. It appears that Brian J. Mistler does not meet the requirements for notability established here: Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Please edit the article to reflect those requirements; otherwise the article will be slated for deletion. (The specific reason being that this person seems to simply be a graduate student with limited publications, most of which are letters to newspapers. Because there are tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of published academics in the world, Wikipedia's guidelines state that simply being a published academic is not grounds for an article.) -Nicktalk 14:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)