Talk:Brian Harrison (theologian)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
Flag
Portal
 Brian Harrison (theologian) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Australia because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WP Australia}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WP Australia}} template, removing {{WP Australia}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

Mr. Brian Harrison has not "had the time" or "the opportunity" to correct critical information that concerns the eternal salvation of souls despite the lapse of four years. And so, Glossando airbrushes Mr. Harrison's portrait to remove all inconvenient facts, to sanitize the truth by making it untruth. Yet, Glossando relies on "private correspondence" to "exonerate" Mr. Harrison! And this is the same Glossando who found my recourse to "private correspondence" in re Kenny Wayne Shepherd's putative marriage to Hannah Gibson as "being offensive" and as "being based on rumor"! This is the fantastic standards that are applied on Wikipedia! Why is it that I am not at all surprised by this arrogant attidude? Needless to say, this comment is purely "academic": I am not interested in a dialogue with Glossando, and I am long disabused of any expectation at finding Wikipedia state the truth. My Wikidness 23:48, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Really, it is a matter of you learning what the rules are on Wikipedia. For the Kenny Shephard article I gave the reasons "violation NPOV, original research, rumor" because you made a statement - "it is claimed" - without any support besides the fact that you cannot possibly decide if a previous marriage was void if you don't know the situation. If the previous woman was not validly baptized it would be a good enough reason. There is nothing in that article that mentions being "offensive" or "private correspondence", so I have NO idea what you are talking about. As for the Brian Harrison article, he publicly explained the position he currently holds in the Remnant newspaper debate with Fr. Cekada, so he doesn't really have anything more essential to do to fix anything. As it stands, the article is accurate. Mature Wikipedians simply discuss these matters on the discussion pages if they have any objections. --Glossando 00:37, 26 September 2006 (UTC)