Talk:Brian Deneke
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] You can not say murdered
This is an opinion, not the facts. The court ruled it was not murder, agree or disagree this is supposed to be an encyclopedia which means facts not opinions.
[edit] "I bet he liked that"
Why isn't Camp still in prison? Didn't he, you know, murder a person? Sorry if I seem old fashioned... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.68.17.141 (talk • contribs) 16:14, March 15, 2007
- He was never convicted of Murder so no he did not "murder" a person, he killed someone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.224.228 (talk) 23:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "icon??"
he's just some guy that died. I think the "Icon" moniker is unencyclopedic. Anyone wanna change since I'm just a unregistered doof? 69.247.73.12 19:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- whoever wrote this is a fagot. he pretty much
- is an icon. almost every punk knows who he was
- and how he died so fuck you.
- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.166.248.5 (talk • contribs) 23:02, May 30, 2007
Don't forget, and it needs to be linked in here to give the article more substance, this story was featured on A&E TV, in an episode of City Confidential. If I knew how to correctly include this tidbit in the main article, I would. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.179.176.42 (talk) 17:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] ==
This page has some really useful information.
http://members.tripod.com/~VanessaWest/deneke.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.206.166.252 (talk) 06:41, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Merger proposal
Per the discussion at Talk:Dustin Camp, I think these two articles should be merged into a new article on the murder and surrounding events, rather than having two articles on individuals notable only for the event. Feel free to discuss. Powers T 17:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Merge - Both individuals are notable for the event alone. The article should be Homicide of Dustin Camp or similar. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ambivalent - In principle I would support a merger, but I would like to see any merger retain all the information of both articles and I would prefer if the merger was performed by somebody familiar with the articles. For instance, I think it's imperative that the primary merging editor be able to distinguish between the victim, Brian Deneke, and the killer, Dustin Camp. Greg Comlish (talk) 19:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Merge - Does not have enough notability on its own merits.

