Brinkmanship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article or section has multiple issues. Please help improve the article or discuss these issues on the talk page.

It needs additional references or sources for verification. Tagged since June 2007.
Its neutrality is disputed. Tagged since May 2008.
It may contain original research or unverifiable claims. Tagged since May 2008.
Its neutrality or factuality may be compromised by weasel words. Tagged since May 2008.

The handling of the Cuban missile crisis has been described as brinkmanship.

Brinkmanship is the practice of pushing a dangerous situation to the verge of disaster in order to achieve the most advantageous outcome. It occurs in international politics, foreign policy and (in contemporary settings) in military strategy involving the threatened use of nuclear weapons.

This maneuver of pushing a situation to the brink succeeds by forcing the opposition to back down and make concessions. This might be achieved through diplomatic maneuvers by creating the impression that one is willing to use extreme methods rather than concede. During the Cold War, the threat of nuclear force was often used as such an escalating measure. Adolf Hitler also used this during his rise to power. Many dictators and fascist leaders use it^{[citation needed]} to make it look like their political methods are legal.

1 Origins
2 Benefits
3 Dangers
4 See also
5 References
6 External links

[edit] Origins

Brinkmanship is the ostensible escalation of threats in order to achieve one's aims. Originally the term brinkmanship was coined by Secretary of State John Foster Dulles under the Eisenhower administration, during the Cold War. Eventually, the threats involved might become so huge as to be unmanageable at which point both sides are likely to back down. This was the case during the Cold War, as the escalation of threats of nuclear war is mutually suicidal.

[edit] Benefits

Brinkmanship became very important in United States foreign policy during Dwight D. Eisenhower's presidency.^{[citation needed]} The American public sought to win the Cold War and also wanted lower taxes. Brinkmanship was a cheap alternative to fighting actual wars.

[edit] Dangers

The dangers of brinkmanship as a political or diplomatic tool can be understood as a slippery slope: In order for brinkmanship to be effective, the threats used are continuously escalated. However, a threat is not worth anything unless it is credible; at some point, the aggressive party may have to back up its claim to prove its commitment to action. The further one goes, the greater the chance of things sliding out of control. The chance that things may go out of control is a key element in providing credibility to this threat, e.g., Kennedy was not willing to start a nuclear war over the Cuban Missile Crisis, but he was willing to risk the start of a nuclear war which was a more believable threat.^[clarify]

The British intellectual Bertrand Russell compared nuclear brinkmanship to the game of chicken^[1]. The principle between the two is the same, to create immense pressure in a situation until one person or party backs down.