Talk:Breda Ba.88

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Aviation Portal

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated projects or task forces:

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:

Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked

To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call:

|B-Class-1=yes/no

|B-Class-2=yes/no

|B-Class-3=yes/no

|B-Class-4=yes/no

|B-Class-5=yes/no

Aircraft WikiProject

Why eliminate every argument about 'the fairness' of the aircrafts? Where is NNNNNNPOV? I have italian vices, OK, la Cappella Sistina etc. but what's wrong to watch about the 'fairness'? I have in this specific case my source of Daniele Lembo, repeat 3 times about the 'fair shape' of the plane BA.88. It's if nothing else, said by someone. More, in my Encyclopedia delle armi da guerra (originally known as War machines, british high-quality encyclopedia) The Breda is called 'fair and tough at the same time'. So i have TWO sources stated that it's a 'fair machine'. So what's the problem?--Stefanomencarelli 22:30, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Breda Ba.88

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Views

Navigation

Interaction

Search