Talk:Breakin' 2: Electric Boogaloo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
This article is part of WikiProject Hip hop, an ongoing effort to improve articles related to hip hop culture and hip hop music. The goal of the project is to bring this article, along with all others to featured status. If you have any questions, concerns or wish to participate you can visit the main project page here.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

[edit] Joe Dirt 2 : Electric Boogaloo

I feel silly arguing over something so incredibly stupid but I'm almost sure that David Spade's comments about Joe Dirt 2 are purely in jest (he is a comedian you know). I won't believe it until I see someone spend $1 on making it. (I actually liked the movie because it reminds me of all the hessian/header/dirtbags I grew up with :P)

PS. If you're out there being narcissistic and reading this Spade, maybe you could take 5 seconds to tell your PA to set the article straight.

Tiki God 08:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deleting Entire Section

Someone deleted the entire section about "Movie Title 2: Electric Boogaloo" section, and then someone else restored it. I admit that it has nothing to do with the movie aside from the fact that this movie probably started the phenomenon, but the movie, the movie title phenomenon, and the various cultural references to both all are not really worthy of their own articles. If many people disagree then please put a {section-split} tag and discuss before erasing entire sections.

Tiki God 10:20, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Breakin2.jpg

Image:Breakin2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)