User talk:BradleyRidgemont

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Indefinite blocks are not defined a permanant. This block was made a longe time ago and I have reason to believe that it was NOT done "per ruling of Jimbo Wales, or the Arbitration Committee, because it was never discussed amongst them. Even though I know and admit I was very much in the wrong by my actions, I don't think it warrented an indefinite block and again, I don't think the Arbitration Committee even talked this over. Besides, this was many months ago and I have learned the error of my ways, I wish to return to Wikipedia and make useful contributions. Simply put, if I can be given another chance, I will do this website well. Thank you.BradleyRidgemont 04:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)"


Decline reason: "Well considering that no positive contributions have been made to the encyclopedia it would seem apparent that this is a sockpuppet account created solely for the purpose of making personal attacks against Srikeit (talk contribs), I am extremely hesitant of unblocking this account with further cause being given. --  Netsnipe  ►  04:35, 1 February 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.