Talk:Bravo (US TV channel)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It would be nice if a more verbose statement was provided along with an edit reversion. In this case, an elaboration on where links to categories should Who is the announcer for the station's commercials?

--The tacked-on little Parody section is not only irrelevant to the topic generally, it's frankly dumb. A parody imitates style while satirizing content--if there's a real phenomenon here and Bravo's programming is any 'more gay' than other networks', that can be addressed. Meanwhile, with respect, does anyone really care what Robot Chicken has to say?

[edit] Logos

• Does anyone have the channel's original (1980-1990s) and previous (1990s-2005) logos? 67.41.213.180 05:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dab with Bravo (UK TV channel)

I'll cross-post this there, but this verges on just plain silly that dabs like Bravo (TV), Bravo (TV channel), Bravo (TV network), and Bravo (channel) somewhat arbitrarily redirect to one or the other (it's actually 2-2 with those! the first and last redirect to Bravo (UK TV channel), and the middle two redirect to Bravo (US TV channel).

Wouldn't this all be simpler if they redirected to a dab specifically on this issue (probably Bravo (TV) would be best for that purpose)? Or is the line at the top of each article meant to alleviate that? I know we've already got Bravo as a dab, but surely it can't hurt to be more specific. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 05:00, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and made the new DAB. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 23:14, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Target audience

I removed possible copy-vio and definite plagiarism from the target audience section. I added some cited information in its place. I think we should try to communicate Bravo's heavy marketing to the LGBT community. It really is a large part of what defines the network right now. It's telling that "gaytvblog.com" has an entire section for Bravo, but obviously a blog isn't a reliable source. If anyone here subscribes to some LGBT magazine that would make a reliable source, it might be good to add some more information in. Gigs (talk) 06:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)