Talk:Bound (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Bound (film) has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 29, 2007 WikiProject peer review Reviewed August 25, 2007 Good article nominee Listed Current Status: Good article

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Films     (Rated GA-Class)   (Rated Low importance) Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale. Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film. Additional Information: This article has had a peer review which is now archived. WikiProject LGBT studies     (Rated GA-Class) LGBT Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.

[edit] Ratings (re: GA nom)

Just a brief comment (not an official review), but I'm unsure about the list of ratings. It is purely a list, violates Wikipedia is not a video guide and is out of context. The JPS^{talk to me} 10:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

OK, I reckon the article is spot on. If it weren't for that list, I would happily pass it. The JPS^{talk to me} 10:56, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

I've been mulling this over for a few days. I hadn't realised his template was so controversial, but I've been looking at its talkpage, AFD etc. I'm not sure I agree with you 100% but I think you're probably right in that it doesn't really add much to this particular article. So, I'm just going to take it out. Thanks for your comments. --BelovedFreak 11:58, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Promoted to GA

The article is broad in coverage, has many reliable sources; non-free media have appropriate rationales. Well done. (For the record, the ratings template thing was a preference of mine -- I wouldn't have stood in the way of someone else promoting the article with it, but i don't think it adds anything at all. Plus, ratings can change through time and/or different mediums.) The JPS^{talk to me} 14:28, 25 August 2007 (UTC)