Talk:Bombay Sapphire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

agreed >This is plain advertising, isn't it ?

Disagree, and I note that both the above comments are unsigned and by unregistered users. Please explain why this is any less encyclopedic an article than any other hundreds of brand-related articles on Wikipedia. If you don't agree with the tone of the article, do feel free to edit away at it! CLW 07:00, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

You imply here that bombay saphire is better than other gins because of more botanicals. A gin isnt necessarily better than another because it has more botanicals.

Why does no one mention that Bombay gin is filled with nutrients that promote healthful vitality? Clearly this should be documented. —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

So go find a published list and add the info yourself. Just don't go into the same stuff you did here Counterfit 22:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

I eliminated unencycropedic descriptive words like "unique" or "distinct". Funniest one is "pure water from Lake Vyrnwy". If water is pure it doesn't matter if it come from Alaska or from your tap. Vapour

"performance art rapist Jurgen Hahn"? Is this necessary and adds to the encyclopeadic content? <- All notable artists that took part in the above mentioned campaign should be included

He's a rapist, though? How can one even be a "performance art rapist?" Nevermind, don't answer that. Reference, please. dB 07:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

I agree. This content has been "refined" by someone who works for/at Bacardi

The spirit is listed at 47% but this might be the export version , as Bombay sold in the UK is 40% . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darwin-rover (talk • contribs) 00:14, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

In real countries, it's 94 proof. 216.37.253.152 (talk) 08:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)