Talk:Boldenone
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Boldenone is part of WikiProject Pharmacology, a project to improve all Pharmacology-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other pharmacology articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. |
|
|
|
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Veterinary medicine.
This project provides a central approach to Veterinary medicine-related subjects on Wikipedia. |
|
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
[edit] This page needs references.
The research is out there. Off the top of my head, some of this may be borderline theory, rather than known facts.
Stating boldenone makes a good replacement for nandrolone doesn't sound neutral, it sounds like bodybuilder giving advice.
--October red 20:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Use of the word "doping" is VERY POV
"Doping" is the favouite word of the IOC witch-hunters, and equates steroid use with "dope", i.e. being stupid, and being a junkie. While some of the medical community have gone along with this very subjective, and very negative term, it is nonetheless a propaganda/newspeak word and is not appropriate. "Use in sports and training" is more like it; the tone in this article, as in the Nandrolone one I also looked at, is also implicitly USA-centric in that it buys into the War on Drugs/Steroids, a distinct bias which likes to presume itself the only truth. The tone of both these pages is POV and I'd come back here to try and work on that: but this is notice that "doping" is an offensive term to the user community, and is only a term used by the witch-hunt teams of the IOC and the DEA.Skookum1 17:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] BLP issues
We really can't say that particular individuals tested positive for an illegal substance without having a reference for them. Please add the citation quickly. --Selket Talk 21:50, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
