Talk:Boeing Bird of Prey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
AVIATION This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Boeing Bird of Prey article.

Article policies


"Government sponsored norm" This is interesting. Could anyone expand on this?

On a different note: I think the name "Switchblade" has been reassigned to a skew-wing [one wing swept forward, one swept back; its weird, but so is the Nighthawk] aircraft project- can anyone confirm or discount this?

The Switchblade codename shift for the skew-wing was published last autumn, I believe. 131.207.236.198 11:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Not so new

This bit: the Bird of Prey was otherwise key in the development of a new kind of low-visibility camouflage. Areas that are usually lit most brightly (such as the horizontal flat surfaces over the wings and the top of the fuselage) were painted more darkly, and areas that are usually not quite as bright (such as the sides of the fuselage and other more vertical surfaces) were painted a lighter shade of gray[citation needed]. This reduced the overall contrast of the aircraft, making the whole shape appear to be one relatively even shade of gray

This is an old concept in camouflage; see the Wikipedia article on Countershading. Besides being found in nature it has also been long used on aircraft, notably during WW2. Roarshocker (talk) 05:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bop-001.jpg

Image:Bop-001.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC)