Talk:Body Transfer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:School Change.jpg
Image:School Change.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 10:39, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Body Transfer.jpg
Image:Body Transfer.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 13:56, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Z43846228.jpg
Image:Z43846228.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 16:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Doesn't look like anybody actually uses this talk page, but...
Apart from some poorly structured sentences, the most glaring problem with this article is the fact that whoever's been editing it writes way too colloquially, which is not encyclopedic. An encyclopedia article is not supposed to spice up the subject at hand. It's simply supposed to tell what happens in the anime and leave it at that. As it is, parts of it read like a high school essay (like starting the synopsis with a question) and the rest of it just seems to spice up the story too much. ("Kenichi discovers a new world of experiences!" and such.)
And after that, the article doesn't even seem to coherently follow the storyline. It just sort of starts to vaguely talk about how "he feels his partners orgasms and not his own" and "his thoughts begin to be voiced by a female." Unfortunately, there's nothing I can really do to fix this without having watched it myself, but somebody, please, get the article sorted out. --Foot Dragoon (talk) 05:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] It's a game, I discovered, at least, originally it was
Yeah, it's a H-game not really a H-anime. However the company and the production and all are too vague and hard to find... Anyway, just thought people would like to know. pmc (talk) 09:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

