Talk:Bodhi tree
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"This tree is a frequent destination for pilgrims, being the most important of the four holy sites for Buddhists." Could we get a link to the other three of the four most holy places in Buddhism? - Heartofgoldfish 03:32, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Reads like religious text
The entire Historical Events section sounds like an excerpt from the Tripitaka. If anyone is better qualified than I am to make it sound like an encyclopedia article, please, go ahead. Colin 01:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
I've boldly retitled this section "In Buddhist chronology" which I believe is a more neutral title that neither affirms nor rejects the historicity of the traditional accounts used as sources. I'm also adding language identifying this content as according to traditional Buddhist accounts. WP:NPOV permits reporting the traditional Buddhist point of view (which is clearly a significant one) so long as other viewpoints are not excluded. Best, --Shirahadasha (talk) 01:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Merged
Shouldn't this be merged with sacred fig (the exact same tree)? Saimdusan Talk|Contribs 02:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Never mind. This was a tree, while the sacred fig is a kind of tree. Saimdusan Talk|Contribs 02:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

