Talk:Boca Raton, Florida
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Talk:Boca Raton, Florida/Archive
[edit] Cleaning
I've cleaned and cleaned, but I just can't seem to get it right. The layout still seems obtuse. Someone got an idea? ReignMan 21:07, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reverting edits
Now why does everyone remove my panoramic photos? The user (no name, just an IP) stated that is shows nothing unique about the city, but it shows, the city! Seriously, I'm working on a skyline pic, but the pano is just for reference, it goes because it's a photo of the city, and this article is lacking those photos so badly. I've been busting my ass gettting all of these photos, and don't like it when someone deletes them without putting up a suitable replacement.
Also, the turkeys? That IS unique! Why delete the wild turkey photo? They exist, and they highlight the wildlife of the city... Jeez. If you're going to delete my photos, at least GET OFF YOUR FAT ASS AND MAKE A BETTER ONE!
Anyway, I'm in the process of writing and photographing a history of the city's east side, which has litteraly, been built twice. We need to find good references for this section, or crete a new article. Believe it or not, Boca was once a warehouse and industrial area, I have found remains of many old sites and via the gentry and historical society, have confirmed the presence of a rail yard at Yamato road on the FEC tracks, which was used to load trucks I believe. There are also some remains of buildings that were removed in the 60s-70s, and some that were rebuilt. This will be a good story to tell, and it's really interesting!
Also, the I-95 pic is temporary, and the Palmetto Park Road pic is probably not the best. I'll be replacing the former soon, that latter, later. ReignMan 07:55, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
ReignMan: A replacement photo is not required and your above language is not appreciated or appropriate. You seem to be too emotionally involved for the overall purpose of this site.
- Nice, leave an unsigned comment and make it italic for effect. No, you're dead wrong. We have a B grade article, it should be better. Go read a good article, and see that it has lots of photos and facts and you don't have to search for 12 hours to find the info you need. My problem is people erasing my photos (taken of things, in the city, that highlight sections of the article) and erase them, because they don't have the "touristy" quality that Boca is known for.
- Well people, here's a fact, Boca Raton is not a tourist attraction, it's a city. It's a major city at that, the G8 has met here, major world events have transpired here (IE, sexual harassment laws began as Lifeguards vs. City of Boca Raton, etc), we have international name recognition, and we have actual roads and buildings, too. We need tons of facts and info, B grade is not good enough. I want to see every fact, figure, and trivia bit you can possibly fit in there. Start with a summary, then go into detail.
- Wikipedia is the greatest tool of knowlage in history, and it may erase the Alexandria Library fire's effect on learning... Imagine what would have been if that never happened? Columbus would have probably landed on the moon in 1492. So lets take this tool and use it. It's up to us to keep it in working order, and to do that we need to provide all the knowlage we can.
ReignMan 04:31, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Boca's Architecture
Both out of architectural tradition and out of the strict building codes and the immense amount of red tape involved in obtaining a building permit, Boca has become home to some very distinct styles of architecture, which have been emulated all around the world. I feel more images would be justified, but am considering creating another page to document this style of architecture. Thoughts? WhoMe? 13:39, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm working on that, added a photo. ReignMan 06:50, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] section/paragraph removed
I just removed some material about why car dealerships are located in Delray Beach. I believe that those dealerships have been located in Delray Beach since long before Boca restricted advertising. Prove me wrong by finding reliable sources that say otherwise.
Boca has had such rules since it's inception. ReignMan 06:50, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
I also removed the weather section that was primarily about damage caused at the airport by Wilma. A request for citations had been attached to that section for quite a while. Re-insert only what can be cited from published reliable sources. -- Donald Albury 22:31, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Well, the hangar fell down, I know this because I saw it. Don't know of a more reliable source, but I'm not the one who put it anyway, I don't really care. But it IS true, I can provide photo proof. ReignMan 07:55, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Town Center... the center?
I believed, Town Center wasn't considered the central area of Boca Raton. Wasn't it the Resort and Club/coastal area?
Town Center was called Town "Center" due to it being smacked down in the middle of Boca Raton "incorporated and not," as well as the fact that the Boca Raton Mall held the rights of the name. --AZ'sReincarnation 16:00, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
As someone who has grown up in this community prior to Town Center mall even being constructed, I can tell you it was considered "west" in the late 1970s when originally built. In the 1980s and 1990s it became more central as new development was focused westward. Only in the past few years were the city limits pushed west to include the mall in the city proper. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.109.93.219 (talk • contribs)
- Yes, but people usually think of what I said about Boca due to numerous motion pictures and such. I live a few blocks away from Town Center and have seen it thrive, die, being recalled to life, and prosper. But do what you want about this. --AZ'sReincarnation 03:30, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Boca Thugs
I really want to do a section about the "fake" thugs and young "criminals" which are mainly poseurs in the city. Tee hee...I won't, lol.
- That would be pointless as there's poseurs all over the U.S. --AZ'sReincarnation 03:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
I put in a reference to actual gang activity in the city as per law enforcement records. There are many "thug lite" creatures in Boca, but there are also real, hard criminals. Make no mistake, Boca Raton is not without it's share of violent crime. My neighbor was murdured, for example. ReignMan 12:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Review of article
ReignMan over at Minneapolis (recently featured status) asked us to give him some comments on this article and how it can be improved. Here's a breakdown of my comments:
- Intro: I am immediately confused about the geopolitical status of Boca Raton. If thousands live in unincorporated areas, then isn't there a Boca Raton metropolitan area? Or have you combined that information into the city's own article. We distinctly separate our metro area with the city proper. Minneapolis is very different from Minneapolis-St. Paul (Twin Cities metro).
- Intro: The second paragraph is a news item not written in encyclopedic tone. It also tells me little about why Boca Raton is important. An intro summarizes the entire article and in that way tells me the significance of the article itself. Is the sole purpose of Boca Raton to continually annex its neighbors? Perhaps the intro should reflect a bit of the development and crime (ie: "Boca Raton is one of the wealthier cities in south Florida, home to the three largest gated communities and contains southern branches of several major corporations. Boca Raton is also a major tourist hub in the summer as well as having undue publicity inconnection to recent national news stories on crime.")
- I think you already know this article does not conform to template for U.S. cities, it should it would flow better
- History: It rolls on and on. The last paragraphs should be separted into an Economy section. Town Center should be in a Culture or Infrastructure section. And uhhhhhh history before 1904 should be elaborated. Raton is of indigenous origin? Ok, where are the Native American tribes? Why were the Spanish there?
- Pictures: Are very helpful. I see there are quite a few of them already, it helps give me as an outsider who knows nothing about your town, an idea of how you see the city. Pictures are great of course BUT some are unnecessary, well IMO, include only pictures which relate directly to Boca Raton as a city and not simply because something happens to be in Boca Raton.
- Geography: perhaps you can tell me more about how the area formed: tectonic plates? cataclysmic monsoons? glacier drainage? meteor? How does the landscape affect and not affect the development ontop of it? Rivers? Lakes? Creeks? Tunnels are alright, they're more Infrastructure though. Geography is purely about nature.
- Politics: NEVER use political words unless you have a direct source. Otherwise "non-partisan" is a POV, your opinion and does not adequately assess what the Council does anyway. How many people are on the Council? Were they always a Council? When did this form of govt come into place? Where is City Hall, how is government managed and distributed? What depts? What districts do your congressmen represent? how about state government?
- Language: Whats a substantial number of Jewish people? 5000, 20,000? Lots of numbers are substantial compared to the city pop and the metro pop, BE SPECIFIC here. .36% of what? Adding a section of ancestry could be helpful to paint the picture of what you people look like.
- Areas west of Boca Raton: This is not a proper section nor heading. It should be combined into either the History section or Infrastructure section.
- Controversies and crime: is only a proper section IF indeed the crimes RELATE to Boca Raton. If they just happen to be in Boca Raton then it does not belong in this article. Because there is not enough of each topic, they should be combined into one or two paragraphs detailing WHY crime is an issue in Boca Raton (which appears to be related to computers)
- Boca Raton in popular culture belongs in the Culture and Arts section.
Lastly, the article has a start, it's not great and more resembles stubs of information than an article that just needs help. It needs to be filled out with content before pictures really do anything helpful. .:DavuMaya:. 09:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Boca Raton2.JPG
Image:Boca Raton2.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 13:45, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Excessive discussion of schools
I have once again removed the excessive descriptions of local schools from this article. If the schools are notable and have their own articles, just link to them. Schools are not the responsibility of the City of Boca Raton, and often have students from outside of the city. This article is not the place for detailed discussions of the schools. -- Donald Albury 12:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "Boca Raton is the "spam capital of the world", being the source of a surprisingly high fraction of all spam generated worldwide,"
Thanks for this part, proof that USA are among the worlds biggest (internet-)terrorists! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.228.223.120 (talk) 13:31, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

