Talk:Block booking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Block booking was a nominee for good article, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
May 10, 2008 Good article nominee Not listed
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B
This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Maintained The following user(s) are actively contributing to this article and may be able to help with questions about verification and sources:
DCGeist (talk contribs  email)
This in no way implies article ownership; all editors are encouraged to contribute.

I have failed this because, while decently-referenced and coherently written, it just isn't comprehensive enough.

The article is basically two things: an explanation of the practice and a history of the legal wranglings around it. It is in that latter that we could know more.

  • What was the studios' defense/rationalization of this (besides their own profits, of course)? Today the cable companies defend themselves against á la carte by claiming that that model makes it possible for them to carry smaller niche-oriented channels which some communities deeply appreciate but which wouldn't survive long (they claim) in a more even-handed market? Did the studios make a similar claim?
  • Who spoke up against this during the 1920s and '30s? There certainly had to be some voices who did. The Poverty Row studios certainly couldn't have been happy with this situation ... did they make any organized efforts to challenge it?
  • Finally, I would ask what the consequences were, except that the article on the Supreme Court case discusses that. We're talking about something that had a profound effect on American cinema — a major nail in the coffin of the studio system. It should be discussed here in even more detail.

Researching this may be a project but there are any number of histories of Hollywood that go into it. When it's been sufficiently expanded, it can be renominated. Daniel Case 21:02, 10 May 2007 (UTC)