Talk:Blanchflower v. Blanchflower
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. |
[edit] Very much skewed interpretation in article.
This article grossly misinterprets and overstates the verdict. The verdict merely says extra-marital lesbian relation (two females licking and tapping each other) does not constitue adultery to heterosexual marriage. Whether sodomy (two men plugging their rods into each other's arse) makes adultery remains to be seen, since it is different, with penetration clearly being realized.
If analsex is recognized as a means of adultery, then lesbian must also, else it would be gender based discrimination, which is unconstitutional. If court finds analsex is no grounds for adultery in heterosexual marriage, then the midwest America will rise, shotgun and pitchfork in hand and cleanse the urban anarcho-liberal scum for good. The Bible clearly describes stoning punishment for anal and animal sexers and America is built on the protestantism, like it or not.
Anyhow, the SCOTUS will have a hard time deciding. 91.83.3.163 (talk) 23:27, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
