Talk:Blackfoot language
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] I want to display ᓱᖽᐧᖿ
How do I display the characters for ᓱᖽᐧᖿ?
ICE77 -- 81.104.129.226 20:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- It displays them just fine for me. It must be that my browser is set up to read the glyphs in the UCAS UniCode range, as I have fonts in that range. CJLippert (talk) 19:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Pronunciation
Taivo, what did you not understand about the pronunciation indications I added? Hyacinth (talk) 20:36, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Simple, [ts] does not occur in the word 'snake' and is not the sound a snake makes and [ts:] does not occur in the word 'eagle' and is not the sound an eagle makes. If you want to bring some wording onto this page for discussion, then do so and we will make better wording, but IPA stands for International Phonetic Alphabet and THAT tells us how it is pronounced, not some animal noise which changes from language to language. Look at other language articles--none of them (or virtually none of them) have "pronunciation aids" to "clarify" the International Phonetic Alphabet. That's the point of the IPA, you don't NEED "clarification" with it. (Taivo (talk) 01:42, 28 April 2008 (UTC))
- Is this article intended only for linguists? Is this article restricted to providing information only from the perspective of linguistics? Hyacinth (talk) 20:11, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- It is Wikipedia practice to present all pronunciation in the International Phonetic Alphabet. The IPA is 100% clear in what it means. Even non-linguistic articles use the IPA for pronunciation (see the article on "Chaps", for example). Even in this case, the symbol [ts] is crystal clear even if one does not specifically know the IPA--a "t" followed by an "s". If you are concerned about "nonlinguists", then are you also going to explain "typologically polysynthetic"? It seems that needs more nonlinguistic explanation than [ts]. (Taivo (talk) 21:59, 30 April 2008 (UTC))
- Is this article intended only for linguists? Is this article restricted to providing information only from the perspective of linguistics? Hyacinth (talk) 20:11, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

