Talk:Birgenair Flight 301

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.	Aviation Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated projects or task forces: Aviation accident task force

[edit] Contradiction

I know this run-on sentence has citation, but it's contradictory. "Investigators never found the pitot-static tubes of the crashed aircraft; entomologists suspected that mud dauber wasps built nests in the pitot-static tubes, blocking them; since the aircraft used had not flied in 25 days the wasps had an opportunity to build nests in the tubes."

If they never found the pitot-static tubes, then what evidence does anyone have that that's the cause? It seems more like conjecture or speculation than proper suspicion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.254.163.150 (talk) 13:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC)