Talk:Bird collections
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA Review
- 1. Well written?:
Yes. The prose is good, and it follows the Manual of Style. - 2. Factually accurate?:
Is well-sourced - 3. Broad in coverage?:
Yes, it is thorough and stays focused on the topic. - 4. Neutral point of view?:
Yes - 5. Article stability?
Yes, no history of edit wars or vandalism. - 6. Images?:
Yes, it is well-illustrated. My only comment is that the images could be larger, so the reader could see the details.
Result:passed. Good work! heyjude. 01:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

