Talk:Biographical film

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.

Contents

[edit] Dispute

The article defines a biographical film as a movie based on an event that did not happen. If this is the way we define it, then we should remove the faith-based ones. I noticed Jesus of Nazareth, but I might have missed others. We could also simply redefine biographical film. Teply 20:17, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

It also says "These may present the events as they actually happened, or may alter the truth for other purposes." and it looks like the Jesus film was removed. --68.198.246.166 14:54, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Yeah, someone did that just recently. I'll remove the dispute. Teply 00:05, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
I don't know about this. If Alexander is considered a biopic, then Jesus of Nazareth could also be considered the same. Both men are historical figures. 66.109.99.18 18:21, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2/2/06 edits

I deleted many pictures when I redid the list of significant films, either because they were historic films that did not tell one character’s life story (Good Night and Good Luck, Schindler‘s List) or merely films based on true events (Catch Me if You Can, Erin Brokovich, Mar adentro). I also made the list more exclusive to films of significant acclaim or historic value; I got rid of the many 2000s-era films on the list that are more recent than significant .

I am not a film scholar nor have I seen every film I deleted (I went based on synopsis from that film’s page some of the time) so if anyone has a good reason to add or re-add a film, please do.

[edit] Pronunciation.

How about a line or two about differences in pronunciation? Is it a bi-o-pick or does it rhyme with myopic? 67.39.182.93 06:46, 17 March 2006 (UTC)


I am also curious about the pronunciation...does anyone know?


This is the reason i came here. should definitely be addressed. 71.110.68.228 17:41, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Agree. it's why I'm here. Nearly and year and still not addressed. This term must be used in Hollywood conversations. anyone? Scarykitty 21:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

I just listened to the audio commentary for Gods and Monsters, and director Bill Condon pronounced it the same way Merriam Webster's 11th Edition dictionary did. Sadly, IPA is far beyond my comprehension, but much to my chagrin, the "o" was long. Drakkenfyre 04:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


It's absolutely got to be long, etymologically. And I'd say Merriam-Webster's is a good enough source to justify at least removing the incorrect pronunciation currently given on the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.5.71.121 (talk) 17:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Manchurian Canidate

I havn't seen Manchurian Canidate, but I've read that it is a biopic. Anyone know?--24.137.137.204 05:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

yeah. it isn't.

[edit] Requested move

It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved.

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was - Biographical filmBiopic not moved as no consensus. Keith D (talk) 21:29, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Biographical filmBiopic — "Biopic" is by far the more commonly used phrase for a film whose subject is an individual person, as evidenced by a Google search. Skomorokh 21:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
  • Oppose — I think that this term is too casual for use as a title of an encyclopedia article, and also not widely enough recognized outside of a cinematic context. ENeville (talk) 15:46, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose – The term "biopic" is more current film lingo than anything else, and we should stay away from "fad" words. Reject "Biopic" is a "slang term". FWiW, it is tantamount to speaking in "industryspeak." Bzuk (talk) 17:04, 13 April 2008 (UTC).
    • As the search results show, it is by far the most commonly used term not only in general, but also in news media and academic discourse. Hardly "industryspeak". Skomorokh 17:07, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
      • Using Google searches can always provide interesting results, but are hardly conclusive, nor authoritative. We can soon use potboiler, mic, gross, clapper loader, etc. BTW. IMDb lists: Biographic Picture, AKA: Biopic, A filmed story of a person's life story. FWiW Bzuk (talk).
        • Interesting point, thanks. I wonder what other film-orientated publications currently use. Skomorokh 23:04, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose. A classical case of Google not representing common English. Andrewa (talk) 14:21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Any additional comments:

From WP:RM:

  • Biographical filmBiopic —(Discuss)— "Biopic" is by far the more commonly used phrase for a film whose subject is an individual person, as evidenced by a Google search. —Skomorokh 21:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
    • Relist to get some input on move. Keith D (talk) 22:02, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
      • Reject "Biopic" is a "slang term". FWiW, it is tantamount to speaking in "industryspeak." Bzuk (talk) 22:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC).

Relisting as requested. Andrewa (talk) 14:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.