User talk:Billiot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] French Page
Hello. I noticed you've made a change to the French language page, saying that there is an agency governing French in Louisiana. Here, I think the meaning of an "agency" is an organization that is recognized as having authority to make determinations about spelling, terminology, etc. We do not have any such authority in English, for example. This does not have to do with regulating when and where the language is used or encouraging its use, but in deciding what the language is, in a sense. Does the agency you mentioned in Louisiana have this role? Joeldl 04:06, 24 March 2007 (UTC) Sorry, I guess I meant "regulatory authority", not "agency" Joeldl 04:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Enjoy!
Trampton has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Trampton 21:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Could you help me write this article?
Hello,
I was wondering if you would be willing to help me write either Seikichi_Iha or Shorin-ryu_Shido-kan. Tkjazzer 21:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Question
Bonjour, est-ce que vous venez de la Louisiane et si oui j'aurai quelque questions à vous demander. Merci
- Merci de votre réponse,
Voici mes questions:
1) Est-ce que le français est enseigné à l'école?
2) Existe t'il des comunautés francophones en Louisiane qui représente la majoritée de la population?
3) Est-ce que là bas le français est en instinction?
4) Est-ce que vous avez la même façon de penser que les autres américains?
5) Dites-moi quelque phrases en cajun pour que je sache à quoi resemble cette langue?
Merci, car je connais très peux à propos des cajuns et si j'ai d'autres questions qui me viennent je vais vous les poster sur votre page. Ps. la nourriture cajun est excellente.
- Merci cela m'a beaucoup aidé pour connaître votre culture. Comeau
[edit] Correction - George Bush did not win the election
I think you did a excellent job explaining the Electoral College and how and why Bush was elected in 2000. Few people I have talked to understand how our Republic works and how we eventually morphed into a democracy. - GreyGh0st 20:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Cajun French Wikipedia
Hi! Your request for a Wikipedia in Cajun French is about to be conditionally approved. To get final approval, you need to translate most of the interface for the Wikipedia. This is done on BetaWiki. Register there and read Translating Intro. Apply for translator status here to get started. Bonne chance! Jon Harald Søby 21:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Who were the first americans?
Hi Billiot... It appears that much of your disagreement (and your claims that he is racist) is centered around two points: the question of "who is the first American?" and the issue of the peacefulness of the native cultures.
Regarding the "first American" issue, you might find this special by PBS to be quite interesting. Apparently archaeologists discovered a Caucasian skeloton that appears to pre-date the earliest known "indian" skeleton. They call it the Kennewick Man. There is currently a lot of debate over the issue, but I think that is where Storm is coming from.
On the second issue... the "Noble savage." It's actually quite an issue. The "Noble savage" myth was a backlash to the "bloodthirsty savage" myth. Both are untrue and both are racist. The truth is somewhere in between. Some tribes were fairly aggressive and some were peacefully. We have a very well-sourced article on the topic here: Noble savage.
I hope that helps and I hope you enjoy both of our articles. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 17:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- You can ignore any evidence you want, but the point I was making is that Storm's opinion is not coming from haltered of the Native Americans - it's coming from actual scientific and sociological discussions. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 16:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Peersonal attacks will not be tolerated
The Message that was previously here was put here by an admitted Racist, Storm Rider, and as such it needed to be removed. Also please note the deliberate tampering with this talk page by said Racist in the removal of factual information from the top of the page that had outlined exactly what offenses to he had stated against my race. You will see that they do not deny that he did it and even had help from from the another Wikipedia Administrator as demonstrated by the note that I did not remove which can be seen below.--Billiot 10:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- One the same note please remove the accusations of racism from this page. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 00:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
On the subject on weteher or not Joseph Smith Jr. was racist, you said that you were on a website that said that if someone form another race became mormon then thay would turn white. I would like to know where you got the information form (post a external link on my talk page at User talk:Miajmw). Also I would ike to note that the mormons are not racist anymore, thay now have all races in there religon now. I am not takeing sides here so do not go onto my talk page and call me a racist becuase I don't take your side (as I have said I am not takeing anyone's side.Miagirljmw14 19:35, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I would also like to note that the FLDS are the type of mormons that are racist (I am still not taking sides, if you would like to post on my talk page it is User talk:Miajmw).Miagirljmw14 17:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] November, 2007
[edit] Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Opus Fundatum Latinitas, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/institutions_connected/latinitas/documents/index_en.htm. As a copyright violation, Opus Fundatum Latinitas appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Opus Fundatum Latinitas has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
-
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Opus Fundatum Latinitas and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Opus Fundatum Latinitas with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Opus Fundatum Latinitas.
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. HalfShadow 07:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:User lsmsa
A tag has been placed on Template:User lsmsa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:User lsu
A tag has been placed on Template:User lsu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
