Talk:Big Brother Australia 2003

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Big Brother WikiProject aims to improve articles relating to Big Brother, and Big Brother Australia 2003 has been identified as one of these articles. Anybody can help the WikiProject by trying to improve existing articles. Please add your name to the list of participants, if you are committed to helping out.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
Flag
Portal
 Big Brother Australia 2003 is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television.
Assessment comments

This page is inconsistent with the latest style of the series Big Brother Australia series 6, and needs to be brought up to date with images placed next to bios, etc. Ste4k 11:14, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Housemates 'table'

I have removed this table because it contained no cited sources. Images have been removed for copyright reasons. -- 9cds(talk) 12:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jaime Cerda

I am positive that he wasn't evicted, he was offered money to leave or stay i remember vaguely. I think it was 10,000 or 5,000 cant remember.

Do you remember the term they did use on the show? --JD[don't talk|email] 03:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
I have only vague memories of this... I seem to recall there were 2 separate houses. In each house three HMs were summonded to diary room and offered the option of swapping houses; the catch was that after a week, the housemates who swapped would be up for eviction - voted by viewers - although the evicted housemate would also win a big cash prize. I recall that Ben Archbold also swapped, but Jaime was evicted based on viewer votes and won the cash. Asa01 04:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Wow, BB03 really was the most complicated of them all... Well, the evic colour can be removed until a better term can be thought of. --JD[don't talk|email] 11:33, 20 July 2006 (UTC)



JAIME CERDA ********

Regina and Ben were swapped to the square house (and Reggie had a pregnancy scare) Jaime and Claire were swapped to the round house. each house then had a secret ballot of who they wanted to stay and when the results came in, it was Jaime who was evicted. THEN they all found out that he had won some money for being the victim of the twist. no one knew before hand there was a prize for leaving...

Actually, the four who swapped over did know, but I don't think they were allowed to tell any of the other housemates. Cyclone49 02:40, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brett's surname

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/04/29/1051381939201.html

Found his surname - Jensen.

[edit] Entry Dates

Didn't Jo enter on Day 2, not Day 1 as stated? And I think Saxon was later in the week, too (Day 5?)

[edit] NO SOURCES

All information on this page needs to be sourced and cited. It is completely unverified. I've added fact tags to key parts of the article that need to be sourced. Please make the effort to take care of them instead of just removing them. They are there because this article needs attention. This article has been on Wikipedia:Cleanup since June 2006 for lack of sources. Could a fan help us get it taken care of? Thank you. --Lendorien 13:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Some of these 'citation needed' requests are hard to understand. Why question the statement 'Chrissie and Daniel came second and third respectively.'? -- Barrylb 14:53, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Technically, all information in an article needs to be sourced. Otherwise it's just hearsay. Any information regarding winners of a show like this should be sourced. Either from a news article or a book. Lack of sources is a real problem on Wikipedia. Sourcing helps insure that information in articles is trustworthy. --Lendorien 14:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
I don't think such sources exist. The only sources may be the show itself. What do you suggest we do? -- Barrylb 12:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Further, I think the issues you raise are far bigger than just this article and we won't achieve anything have citation needed tags just for this one. All other Big Brother articles are similar. I think the issues should be discussed in another location. -- Barrylb 12:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BB03CLOSE.jpg

Image:BB03CLOSE.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)