Talk:Big Brother 2007 (UK)/Archive 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Guru Task

The colour in the nominations table should be more like week 7 in BB5 (the private and sergent task)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Brother_2004_%28UK%29 81.152.87.25 10:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

See the discussion below, but I am going to have to say that on BB5 from reading guidelines on WP:BIGBRO the "Sergeant in task" color should be yellow since they couldn't nominate and were save from eviction and the "Private in task" should be the grey color for "No nominations" since the Privates couldn't nominate but faced eviction that week.♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 03:03, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Guru colour

I put that original colour to match the In Big Brotherhood colour from BB7, it seems similar. Should we thus change the BBhood colour as well, or come up with a new colour, for the sake of uniformity? godgoddingham 333 10:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

My reasoning for changing the Guru color is that according to the guidelines of WP:BIGBRO the yellow color is used for a housemate when they can't nominate or be nominated for eviction. Since a Guru can't be nominated for eviction and can't nominate from what I have read the yellow color follows the guidelines. The "Big Brotherhood" from BB7 should be yellow also while the "Not in Big Brotherhood" should be the grey color because they can't nominate but they face eviction. At least that's what I get when I read/watch the episodes and read about what is going on in the house. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 11:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm with Alucard on that. John Hayes - On Vacationtalk 13:37, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
I say we go back to BB5 and change the "Sergeant in task" to yellow since those housemates couldn't nominate and were save from eviction and change the "Private in task" to the shade of grey that is used for "No nominations" since they mean the same thing. Same with the "Big Brotherhood" task in BB7 change everyone who was in "Big Brotherhood" to yellow and change everyone who wasn't in BBhood to the shade of grey used for "No nominations". That should make the articles uniform with each other plus utilize the guidelines of WP:BIGBRO. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 03:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
I agree wholeheartedly. Also, I'm going to change the table to read "Body Gurus" instead of "Body Guru" for the twins if that's ok... T (Formerly Known as FireSpike) 04:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
The twins are classed as one HM so it should be Body Guru methinks... ? godgoddingham 333 10:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

I went back and made the changes so they are now uniform with each other and they go by the guidelines. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 04:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Tabloid newspaper columnists have been complaining that this series is boring

I couldn't specify which, because I was only told about this from my flatmate who reads these papers, but it seems that many think this is on a par with Big Brother 2003 (UK) as the most unentertaining series yet.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:57, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Well if we have some sources it can probably be mentioned in a paragraph on critical reception or something similar. John Hayes - On Vacationtalk 16:38, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
You've got to be kidding me.. Can you even remember the utter snore-fest that was Cameron, Jon Tickle, and god knows who else? at least with this one there was Emily (who only lasted a week but I'm sure everyone will remember), Charley, Chiggy, Twins, Brian, etc. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Feudonym (talk • contribs) 00:11, August 24, 2007 (UTC).

Weekly summary, sections

I fixed what someone else tried to do, adding the weekly summary as sections, but i cannot remember how to remove the [edit] from the table. It looks ugly with them there. If someone can do/remember how to do this, i'm sure there is a way. Thanks -- Halo2 Talk 00:14, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Charley's Fake eviction colour

Surely this shouldn't be the same colour as "walked" 12bigbrother12 03:04, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

It's not, it is a lighter shade of the eviction color which used to be the ejected color before a decision was made to change it. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 04:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)